Create your own space and show the world what makes your life creative.
Join Now
Arts in America Series: An Introducti on
Bill Ivey's new book, Arts, Inc. How Greed and Neglect Have Destroyed Our Cultural Rights, combines personal and professional experience with policy analysis to make a case for reshaping America's cultural system. Twice elected Chairman of the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, Ivey was Director of the Country Music Foundation from 1971 to 1998, before serving as the chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts (from 1998 through 2001.) On Thursday May 21st, 2009, the University of California Press in association with CORE: and Ovation TV hosted a panel discussion and book signing to consider the issues documented in Ivey's book. Gaynor Stachan-Chun, Senior Vice President of Marketing at Ovation TV, moderated the discussion with Mr. Ivey, Agnes Gund and Robert Lynch.
(from left to right: Gaynor Strachan-Chun, Robert Lynch, Agnes Gund and Bill Ivey)
Their conversation touched on a lot of really interesting issues, including: the value of creativity, how we pay for the arts, and what leaders might do to help the arts. As a citizen, and an advocate for the arts, I question our government's spending priorities. We're spending billions and billions to save companies too large to fail, and not enough on smaller bailouts - including arts bailouts - that would reap larger and more widespread economic benefits. Michael Kaiser, arts organization guru and current President of the Kennedy Center wrote in the Washington Post that "the arts in the United States provide 5.7 million jobs and account for $166 billion in economic activity annually." According to the GM website, that company employs just 252,000 - and that's globally - not just in the United States. Why are we not spending more to save arts institutions? Given the many compelling priorities facing the administration such as the economy and Healthcare reform, and the competition for funding, I think public discussion about the arts, arts education and America's cultural system is critical.
Arts organizations rely on multiple revenue streams: earned revenue, private donations, foundation giving, and government funding. What this means is that public funds are leveraged by three other revenue streams. While for-profit business has one major stream (sales), non-profits are buoyed by four. Because three of the non-profit streams are shrinking, government funding now has an even larger impact than it usually does. There are two fields of inquiry that feed into a real answer to why we're not spending more on the arts. One has to do with how we participate in the arts (define it, fund it, and experience it), and the other has to do with the role of non-monetized products in our culture (including pure science research, the humanities, and the arts.)
Reporting earlier last week in the Los Angeles Times Charles McNulty defended President Obama's attendance at a Broadway show by summarizing Aristotle's understanding of theater. McNulty wrote, "Aristotle was the first to recognize the theater's unique potential to harness our deepest feelings of pity and fear in the service of an enlightenment that is ultimately in the public interest... Minds require education; souls need cultivation. The capacity for inner growth might be innate, but the tank demands fueling."
I am a dancer and choreographer myself, but in addition to my work as an artist, I am Chair of the DC Advocates for the Arts. The DC Advocates for the Arts represent artists and arts organizations in the District of Columbia in interaction with policy-makers to support local art. I want my work as an Artist to stand on its own as a contribution to the larger culture. But I see that our common understanding of what art is, and what art should be, really influence how my work is seen.
In this series of blog posts we'll look at some of the topics mentioned above with clips from the actual event. Ivey's book, and this event, are important contributions to our civic dialogue. I hope that you'll check back each Monday for the new posts and contribute to the on-going conversation on Arts in America.
Rob Bettmann for Ovation TV
Rob Bettmann is the current chair of the DC Advocates for the Arts. He's also a dancer, choreographer and writer based in the District of Columbia, and is editor of the online arts magazine Bourgeon. He blogs at www.dcblog43.com.
-
-
Comments: 9Views: 2683
Comments
-
Former Member , 4 years ago | FlagIn response to the NAEP "Arts Report Card"...I read the sample questions and am not at all surprised by the results. I could go on and on about the issue of asking objective questions concerning visual art. It doesn't work and it accomplishes nothing of value short of realizing that testing of this nature or any other, for that matter in the visual arts is a useless and segregationist tool. For starters, most students are taught at home that art is superfluous and should only be taken for "easy" credit...It's been that way for decades. That is certainly not the case in my classroom or with any of the other art teachers that I know. I'm required to objectively assess all of my students every 9 weeks and provide a mid-term and final exam. In preparation, I cover the material thoroughly by providing hand-outs, showing powerpoint presentations, requiring essays and telling students what notes to take (most don't) and about 30-40% of students fail. They would fail the class completely if that were the only method for checking their progress.
Sometimes, in fact most of the time, the art making process IS the learning experience and the results are extremely subjective based on each individual student. How can you compare a child's work with learning disabilities or poor cultural and socio-economic backgrounds, to a student who has every possible advantage going for them? We can do that in art classrooms. I'm not going to say, as I've read in the past, that art and music improve academic scores because I don't think it's always true. But, a standardized test cannot see the light come on in a child's head when they "get it". We can. No, not all of my students are "A" students and some do "fail" and they know why. In public schools, we don't have the luxury of "picking" who we want to teach, but I love every single one of them, even the ones who will probably wind up in prisons eventually. We often teach the students that no one else wants. We have more successes than failures by far. We are not saints or miracle workers. I can never teach the same material in the same manner to every class because each group of students has its own set of dynamic needs to work with.
I resent the implication that we are poorly doing our jobs because of some worthless statistics based on tests that were designed (and this often goes unsaid) by some committee of scholars who were last in a classroom several years ago, if at all. I will say this with brutal honesty and all sincerity...If one has a problem with public education, then they should get off their self-righteous money grubbing rears, get in a classroom and do something about it.
Sorry for such a rant, but I am so very passionate about arts education, our kids, our schools and the incredible people I work with.
-
Former Member , 4 years ago | FlagAs a visual arts educator, I've worked collaboratively with math, english and history teachers to create lessons which emphasis creative thinking and problem solving skills. Those lessons have allowed and encouraged thousands of students to grasp complex geometric principles, understand literary nuances and do in depth historical analysis in a fun and engaging way. Einstein said he was a visual thinker and that he could not have developed most of his theories had he not been able to see them visually in his head first. Lets not forget that he failed math. When Steve Jobs spoke to our school system's entire 10,000 plus faculty to introduce us to Macintosh computers (which every student and educator recieved in 2000), what did he emphasize? The creative possibilities of technology. Who provided the greatest avenue for creative exploration? Arts Educators, and we still do.
Core academic knowledge is essential to communication and intellectual development, but without nurturing the creative processes in our children, we will have nothing more than a nation of uncultured, regurgitative corporate trolls who don't do much more than the menial jobs they are assigned while not adding much to our country as a whole. We drive around in our private little boxes, consume indentured servitude products without second thought and watch competitive sports like our lives depend on some team winning a game. It seems we've already reached that plateau.
Art, be it visual, performing or literary, is one of the few disciplines that ask of and allows students to search within themselves and find that spirit which drives us on, speaks to our pasts and addresses our future. We can brag that we live better than people in most other countries and assume that makes us better. The Romans thought that way and so did the Grecians. We'd better wake up. Most other countries have been around a whole lot longer than us and all of them have had to learn the hard way, that money, greed and creative stagnation are fleeting. In America, people who ridicule artists and arts educators as "flakes", resent them for what they truly represent and can not understand...a real path to freedom.
-
Cheryl, 4 years ago | FlagTony,
I don't think we have establishe
d that art is essential, etc. Some of us agree, but throughout the country? Throughout the education system, the school boards, and the schools themselves . Do all the parents see our point, and agree. Do the politician s and the budget makers agree? No, we may have agreed amongst ourselves on that general idea, but now we need to figure out the hows, whys and wherefores
so we can take our case to the public. -
RobertBettmann, 4 years ago | FlagWhat next is simply not a forgone conclusion
. Math and reading scores are low... "we're gonna cut hours of math/readi
ng instructio n to teach kids to dance/pain t/play recorder?? ???" And even if 'yes' to arts education.
.. what? and how? Recent study -- last week - shows that what is being taught is being taught very poorly. How should we teach, and what? And to answer that you do need multiple answers to 'why?' -
tonymarq, 4 years ago | FlagHere's my logic on further talks:
Haven't we already establishe
d that art is essential to our developmen t and therefore, should be added to our educationa l system? If the answer is no, then we'll spend another few more years debating its merits. If the answer is yes, what next?
I personally
believe that it is yes. So what next, more talks? - See my delimma?
Inappropriate Flag
Flagging notifies the Ovation webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!
If you believe this content violates the Terms of Service, please write a short description why. Thank you.
Inappropriate Comment Flag
Flagging notifies the Ovation webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!
Email Friends
Your First Name (optional)
Email Addresses (comma separated)
Import friends
Message to Friends (optional)
Are you human?
Or, you can forward this blog with your own email application.